chedylan 2 2:48 Fri Oct 13
same old west ham?
|
|
So despite stll being in profit regarding transfers for the last summer window.
Apparently there is no money for new signings this January
I appreciate that our wage bill has probably increased somewhat, but what happened to all of the TV revenue money for the season? A figure well over 100 million quid.
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Nobody
9:56 Wed Oct 25
Re: same old west ham?
|
same old west ham?
Yes! Nobody does it better...
|
nychammer
7:50 Sat Oct 14
Re: same old west ham?
|
true strikers who can play in Moyes's set up are as rare as pixie shit, but we have to start to conceive of a world without Antonio sooner than later, and he will be missed for his goals, physical presence and chasing of lost causes.
Lets see how Kudus shapes up in the next few games. The early signs are encouraging, but i think we should try and get someone in January as we have a long season ahead potentially.
|
rumford
7:34 Sat Oct 14
Re: same old west ham?
|
Most clubs outside the big six often borrow money for transfers. That's due to their revenues being almost double ours.
|
Johnson
6:09 Sat Oct 14
Re: same old west ham?
|
We know two things about Sullicunt and one about Moyes:
Sully is happy with finishing 17th at least and that’s pretty much guaranteed already.
He thinks cup runs are an inconvenient cost.
Moyes thinks Michael Antonio is the only striker on earth.
So it would not surprise me one bit if Sullicunt has already got his minions putting the word out there’s no money in January. There’s rarely money in January. Remember January 2022?
|
claypole
12:27 Sat Oct 14
Re: same old west ham?
|
After listening to Maguire the other day I can see him here in January.
|
Side of Ham
12:22 Sat Oct 14
Re: same old west ham?
|
The January window is rarely a good time to buy anyways......maybe a loan to boost the squads options where needed.....for instance we need an inform forward/striker and any striker in form is not going to be sold for a fair amount in the mid season let alone the summer.
|
chedylan 2
12:14 Sat Oct 14
Re: same old west ham?
|
My opinion is there is difference between saying there is ‘no money’ and just not saying anything at all.
|
Gaffer58
7:35 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
There must be otherwise how will Moyes be able to get his love child in, Maguire?
|
RBshorty
6:41 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
Hmmm. Seem's like a really good idea to inform all and sundry of our plans for January. In the 2nd week of October.!
|
MaryMillingtonsGhost
5:42 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
marty feldman 5:29
Didn't know pickled was an ITK? I assumed you were referring to Claret&Hugh.
|
marty feldman
5:29 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
I think everyone knows the source . Ones a pisshead and the other is a bit camp .
|
1964
4:43 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
Source?
|
LJC
3:54 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
Who said there’s no money to spend? All I keep seeing is us being linked with players? CB, CM, RB and CF.
|
SnarestoneIron
3:30 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
If we said we had money to spend, we'd slate the board for showing our hand!
|
WHUDeano
3:12 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
A cheeky loan bid for Sancho wouldn’t go amiss
|
scott_d
3:09 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
Of course there is money available.
Whether we (Moyes) spends it, is a different matter.
Once thing is for certain, I don't expect us to sign a striker.
|
Steady
3:07 Fri Oct 13
Re: same old west ham?
|
It’s called not letting the opposition know we have money and playing the skint card
|
| 
